9/20/2023 0 Comments Best rank supreme vourt jydge![]() His decisions on judicial review, Indian tribes and other fundamental issues reflected the fact that these were the first defining cases. “A hush falls upon us even now as we listen to his words,” Justice Benjamin Cardozo wrote more than two centuries later.ĭespite such praise, Marshall has an obvious advantage. He also issued a series of decisions involving the balance of power between the federal government and the states that laid the legal foundation for the young republic. Madison (1803), which established the supremacy of the Court in legal judgments. Marshall authored the most important American judicial opinion of all time: Marbury v. John Marshall, Charles Evan Hughes and Earl Warren all sat on the bench during transformative periods in American history and the social and political consequences of their decisions reverberated for generations. One of the primary measures of greatness on the Supreme Court is the impact a justice’s decisions have on the society at large. The nine justices featured on the pages that follow all exhibited an ability to rise above conventional thinking and prejudices and epitomize what constitutes the right stuff on the Supreme Court. However, close examination of the records of the 111 justices who have served on the Court reveals that a select few managed to see a legal horizon far beyond the view of their contemporaries, often espousing views that would not reflect majoritarian values for decades. There is no standard profile for the selection of great justices. Even though America has the deepest pool of lawyers in the world, if genius is found on the modern Court it is largely accidental. Such formulaic selections reflect the vagaries of our political system, but also our discomfort with people who are creative thinkers and can’t be easily pigeonholed as either judicial activists or strict constructionists. The most notable trend in recent decades has been for presidents to put forward nominees who have empty files: impressive academic and judicial résumés combined with a sparse history of controversial speeches or writings that might be turned against them during the confirmation process. Even though she often dictated the outcome of cases, she did so with insular and sometimes conflicting rationales. O’Connor virtually functioned as a court of one - the consistent swing vote on a Court rigidly divided in many areas by a 4-4 split - but will not be remembered for the depth or consistency of her opinions. ![]() Marshall brought a deep sense of social justice to the Court’s deliberations, but he was not equally known for his contribution to legal theory and doctrine - at least, no more than the vast majority of his predecessors or successors. She has been widely compared to Thurgood Marshall, the first African-American justice, and Sandra Day O’Connor, the first female justice, both of whom made history by breaking racial and gender barriers.īut neither Marshall nor O’Connor are generally viewed as intellectual leaders on the Court. ![]() When President Barack Obama put her up for Senate confirmation this summer, he touted her “empathy” and potential for blazing a new historical trail as the first Latina justice. ![]() The Supreme Court Case That Decided Indian Sovereignty The 9 Greatest Supreme Court Justices Close ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |